News

What HR Needs to Know About Expunged Criminal Records and Background Checks

 

This blog has been written by Roy Maurer of SHRM. Pre-Check is re-posting it with permission.

Roy Maurer | roy.maurer@shrm.org

 

Employers that conduct background screens need to keep up as states expand the types of criminal records eligible for sealing or expungement.

 

Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington, D.C., recently proposed to wipe clean the arrest records of people who were not later convicted. Her plan joins a spate of efforts dubbed "second chance" or "clean slate" bills that would limit employers' access to criminal records of arrests without convictions, minor misdemeanors and even low-level felonies, to improve ex-offenders' job prospects.

Most states allow for criminal records to be sealed or expunged, although laws vary by state. Some states do not permit expungement, or they allow expungement under very limited circumstances. Dealing with sealed or expunged records can be tricky for employers conducting background screens because of differences in state laws and the presence of records tagged for sealing or expungement online or in databases that are then scooped up in bulk by consumer reporting agencies. There have been a number of lawsuits filed against employers for making employment decisions based on sealed or expunged records.

Sage Knauft, a partner in the Orange County, Calif., office of law firm Walsworth, discussed with SHRM Online what HR professionals should know about the legislative efforts to seal or expunge a broader array of criminal records and how to protect a company from liability in this area.

SHRM Online: Is there a trend toward states expanding the types of criminal records eligible for sealing and expungement?

Knauft: Yes, nationwide, there has been a recognition that the incarceration rate in this country is very high and the number of people with a criminal record is as much as 1 in 3. Often, criminal records serve as a "scarlet letter" that prevent ex-offenders from ever re-entering society and gaining employment. Legislative efforts have been two-fold: on the criminal side, to expand the types of offenses subject to sealing and expungement, and on the HR side, the ban-the-box ordinances. In California, for example, over the last couple of years, legislation has broadened the types of criminal offenses that are subject to having records sealed or expunged.

SHRM Online: What impact does this have on hiring?

Knauft: I could easily see an applicant bringing a discrimination claim based on [an employer] making a hiring decision from using records that were supposed to be sealed or expunged. As with anything else in HR, documenting everything is paramount when trying to avoid liability in hiring discrimination. I would absolutely dissuade HR from relying on criminal history information found online without further verification. Information on the Web can be dated or inaccurate and may not reflect a recent effort to have a record sealed or expunged.

Beyond that, HR is at the mercy of how up-to-date criminal history information is. Under many ban-the-box ordinances, if you receive a positive hit, you must explain to the applicant why that record may or may not impact your hiring decision and give [him or her] time to respond. I would think during that process, there would be some discussion about whether that record was supposed to be sealed or expunged. If that's the case, document that discussion before making an adverse decision based on that finding.

 

SHRM Online: What safeguards should HR employ to not inadvertently base hiring decisions on sealed or expunged records?

Knauft: First and foremost, keep up with all relevant laws. HR should know the phase of the hiring process [in which] they are permitted to make a criminal history inquiry and what they have to tell the applicant about their intent to run such a check. Employers would want to ensure they are using a reputable background screening vendor and to speak with [the vendor] about the safeguards [it uses] to ensure that positive criminal records hits are cross-referenced with county-specific records to see if there are any updates as to those convictions being sealed or expunged. Third-party vendors should not only run the search but verify the results, giving the employer another layer of protection. 

/ Print
Posted by Sandra Shinn in General

Comments


Be the first to comment
Name*
E-mail*
Website
Comment*
1 Pending Comments
 Keep me updated of follow-up comments!
Most Recent

By Sandra Shinn
February 21, 2018 Category • General

The statistics from the 2017 Quest Diagnostics international drug testing case study are in. According to this study, approximately 183 million individuals tested positive for marijuana, 37 million for methamphetamines, and 35 million for opioids. With an estimated 312 million drug users worldwide, it is crucial that organizations in the private sector recognize the challenges associated with their drug testing procedures and plan accordingly. Additionally, it would be wise for them to develop or enhance a drug-free workplace program, or even begin offering current employees assistance and/or rehabilitation for treatable conditions and drug abuse. Drug testing to prevent drug abuse on and off the job remains the number one priority. Whether inside or outside of the United States, organizations continue to try to ensure fast turnaround times and convenient drug testing sites for their applicants and employees. So, what happens when an applicant or employee happens to be overseas

By Sandra Shinn
February 08, 2018 Category • General

Recent publication from Seyfarth Shaw on January 25, 2018 announces, Employers should investigate their hiring and compensation practices to ensure compliance with recent antitrust pronouncements. The recommendation from Seyfarth Shaw of conducting an internal investigation is due to the recent developments regarding Antitrust Laws that establish the rules of competitive employment in the marketplace. Surprisingly, there are plenty of different scenarios that could get employers and/or their company/organization in trouble with the Department of Justice (DOJ). This means potentially being held accountable in upcoming class action law suits. The Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals emphasizes the rules surrounding free and open markets: Organizations and individuals cannot establish naked agreements with others that compete to hire employees. These agreements include wage-fixing or no-poaching collaborations among multiple employers. Such agreements are looked

By Sandra Shinn
January 23, 2018 Category • General

Based on recent analyses performed by Quest Diagnostics, there has been a huge increase in illicit drugs particularly cocaine driving workforce drug positivity rates to their highest in the past 12 years. The analysis consisted of more than 10 million workforce drug test results, and were sharing some of the key findings in todays blog post: Urine Testing Urine drug testing positivity as a whole has increased by 5% from last years rate of 4% - the highest annual rate since 2004. Cocaine For the fourth consecutive year, there has been a urine drug testing positivity increase for cocaine use, having risen by 12% since 2016. However, one of the most surprising findings is that post-accident drug tests conducted were positive more than twice that of pre-employment drug tests. This was also higher than the rate of random drug tests. Marijuana Marijuana use has been climbing over the years, and it comes as no surprise that marijuana positivity rates have increased by 75% based